The Brain Needs to “Wander and
Wonder”
(Part 2)
Visual spatial thinking is facilitated
most readily through the development of art, imagination, and exploration. Art
and visual imagery have been key contributors to the human experience
considerably longer than the printed word has. Nearly 2.5 million years ago, hand tools surfaced as an integral
part of the daily life for primitive mankind.
The first evidence
of prehistoric art forms did not appear until roughly 80,000 years ago.
There is an
abundance of signs that the earliest art forms were “manuports.” These naturally-formed
or man-made portable artifacts were valued for having an appearance that was similar
to any well-known object, particular those that were personally important or appealing.
These visually attractive objects were saved and carried about, due to their striking
likeness to a fertile woman (e.g., the Venus of Wilendorf), a horse or a bison.
A massive cognitive
leap took place with the introduction of tools, language, art, and large-groups
living. Coincidentally, a threefold increase in hominid braincase also occurred
during this same time period. Each of these new human competencies appears to
have significantly impacted the fast-paced evolution of the others. The milestones
highlighting man’s evolution include the rapid and sudden advances in human
intelligence.
The survival imperatives of 2 million
years ago dictated that our ancestors cultivate a keen ability to distinguish a
potential opportunity from an impending danger, which meant developing visual
memory systems coupled with an awareness of the broad categories that could be
used to classify objects in the environment. Upon encountering an object or
animal, (1) it could be an animal or object that clearly falls into a
particular category, (2) it could concurrently enjoy membership in more than
one category, and (3) at first glance, its initial identification could be in error.
Being cognizant of the three possibilities prompted the evolution of
flexibility in one’s responses, which contributed to our ancestors’ survival.
Our
startled reaction to a snake-like vine on the walkway has the precautionary
benefit of alerting us to a potentially fatal encounter with a poisonous
reptile. In 1915, Edgar Rubin gave the above
“is-it-a-face-or-is-it-a-vase?” conundrum a permanent place in visual
perception research. Mother
Nature can be most unforgiving allowing us only one life-ending miscalculation
of this type. Cases of fortuitous multiple identifications of this sort
determined if one lived to see another day, and reveals how the mind developed
a propensity to look for glaringly conspicuous characteristics in objects,
which allows us to place them into one category or another.
No comments:
Post a Comment